Language & Section



Language Policy

Advanced Research Journal accepts manuscripts only in English. Authors could use either British (-ise) or American spelling for their manuscript; however, one style should be used consistently throughout the manuscript.

The manuscripts submitted to the journal should have a plain and clear language quality and should be consistent with the scientific literature and English language rules. Manuscripts should be written fluently and free of foreign words.

Advanced Research Journal journal provides a complimentary final basic proofreading service for accepted manuscripts to ensure that they meet the journal's language standards and are free of grammatical and typographical errors before publication.


Section Policy

Advanced Research Journal accepts original research articles, review articles, case studies, case reports, short communications, book reviews, etc.

Research Articles

Research articles should be highly scientific papers using qualitative, quantitative, mixed, and single-subject methodology and focusing on topics related to the aims and scope of Advanced Research Journal. Advanced Research Journal seeks submissions connecting applicable suggestions with quality practices. Theory, policy, and practice are expected to be tightly connected in the submitted papers.

Review Articles

Review articles should link theory and practice and produce critically informative resources for educators, practitioners, and policymakers. Advanced Research Journal seeks submissions that are in line with its aims and scope and critically combines applicable proposals with quality practices. Theory, policy, and practice are expected to be tightly connected in the submitted papers.

Critical Perspective Articles

Critical discussion/perspective articles should focus on key concepts or common ideas in Advanced Research Journal's aims and scope, discussing current advances or future directions from personal views and opinions. These articles should have an innovative, provocative, and original perspective between theory and practice in Advanced Research Journal journal's aims and scope.

Case Reports

Case reports should document unique or noteworthy instances encountered in research or practice that are relevant to the aims and scope of Advanced Research Journal. These reports should provide detailed descriptions of novel findings, unexpected outcomes, or rare phenomena across scientific disciplines. Authors should present a clear background, precise methodology, and comprehensive discussion of the case's significance. Case reports should emphasize the potential implications for future research, theory development, or practical applications. While focused on a specific instance, these reports should contextualize the case within the broader scientific landscape, demonstrating its contribution to the field.

Short Communications

Short communications are brief reports of original research or significant findings that provide a concise yet impactful contribution to the field. These submissions should focus on presenting new data, innovative methodologies, or preliminary findings that are relevant to the aims and scope of Advanced Research Journal. While brief, these communications should be thorough, including essential figures, tables, and references to support the findings. The integration of theory, policy, and practice should be evident, highlighting the relevance and potential implications of the research. Submissions should maintain clarity and precision, ensuring that the significance of the work is communicated effectively to the readership.

Book Reviews

Book reviews should critically assess recently published books in areas relevant to the aims and scope of Advanced Research Journal. Reviews should provide a comprehensive overview of the book’s content, evaluate its contribution to the field, and discuss its relevance to current theory, policy, and practice. The review should offer insightful and constructive critiques, highlighting both the strengths and potential areas for improvement. It should include an analysis of how the book contributes to the existing body of knowledge and its practical applications for educators, practitioners, and policymakers. The reviewer should provide a balanced perspective, offering a clear recommendation regarding the book’s value to the journal’s audience. The review should be engaging and informative, serving as a valuable resource for readers seeking to stay informed about the latest publications in the field.

*Prepared by the publisher, reviewed, and approved by Advanced Research Journal Editors and commissioned Editorial Board Members. Updated on 7 October 2024.