Algorithmic exploitation in the gig economy: A living wage analysis of ride-hailing platforms in Lagos and Accra


Abstract views: 11 / PDF downloads: 3

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71350/3062192581

Keywords:

Algorithmic exploitation, gig economy, living wage, ride-hailing platforms, Global South labor, digital inequality

Abstract

This research elucidates the systemic mechanisms of algorithmic exploitation within the ride-hailing economies of Africa, contesting the prevalent notion that digital labor platforms enhance worker empowerment in Lagos and Accra. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes the analysis of 15,000 ride records, 87 in-depth driver interviews, and localized cost structures, this study illustrates how platform algorithms contribute to wage reduction, shift operational risks, and perpetuate inequality under the guise of technological advancement. The findings indicate that drivers earn 34% less than living wage benchmarks, despite working 14-hour days. Additionally, they incur hidden costs, including $1,200 per year in vehicle depreciation and 14% of their earnings on mobile data—expenses that platforms intentionally shift to workers. An original Algorithmic Exploitation Index (AEI) was developed to measure these dynamics, indicating that an artificial oversupply of labor reduces fares by 7.4% for every 10% increase in drivers, while embedded biases result in a 31% disadvantage for female drivers in ride allocation. This research integrates labor economics and critical platform studies to propose a framework for analyzing digital exploitation in the Global South, characterized by significant informality and insufficient regulation that facilitate corporate extraction. We propose policy measures, including AEI transparency mandates, cost-adjusted fare floors, and digital collective bargaining to equilibrate power in platform labor markets. This study extends beyond ride-hailing to explore intersectional vulnerabilities in gig work, focusing on algorithmic discrimination and the long-term health impacts of precarious platform employment. The future of equitable employment in a progressively digital urban economy depends on aligning technological advancements with essential labor rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abebe, R., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., Levy, K., Raghavan, M., & Robinson, D. G. (2023). Roles for computing in social change. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Anker, R. (2011). Estimating a living wage: A methodological review. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---integration/documents/publication/wcms_162117.pdf

Anker, R., & Anker, M. (2017). Living wages around the world: Manual for measurement. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786431462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786431462

Arrieta-Ibarra, I., Goff, L., Jiménez-Hernández, D., Lanier, J., & Weyl, E. G. (2018). Should we treat data as labor? Moving beyond "free." American Economic Association Papers & Proceedings, 108, 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181003

Chen, L. (2021). Data costs as wage deductions: The hidden architecture of algorithmic pay. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1128-1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820920809

Chen, L., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2022). An empirical analysis of algorithmic pricing on the Amazon marketplace. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference, 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517745.3561419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3517745.3561419

Chen, L., & Sun, T. (2022). Algorithmic gender discrimination in gig economies: Evidence from 12,000 ride-hailing drivers. Gender & Society, 36(3), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124322210924

Dube, A. (2019). Minimum wages and the distribution of family incomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 268-304. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170085

Fairwork Foundation. (2023). Fairwork Ghana ratings 2023: Labour standards in the platform economy. University of Oxford. https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/97/2023/11/Fairwork-Ghana-Report-2023.pdf

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). (2023). Quarterly labour force statistics report: Q3 2023. https://statsghana.gov.gh

Graham, M. (2020). Regulate, replicate, and resist: The conjunctural geographies of platform capitalism. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717028

Graham, M., & Anwar, M. A. (2019). The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913

Johnston, H., Land-Kazlauskas, C., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). The regulation of non-standard forms of employment in Ghana and Nigeria (ILO Working Paper No. 71). International Labour Organization.

JATO Dynamics. (2023). Emerging markets vehicle depreciation report 2023. JATO Dynamics Ltd.

Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056

Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2019). The politics of operations: Excavating contemporary capitalism. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478003267

National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Nigeria labour force survey: Q2 2023 report. https://nigerianstat.gov.ng

Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520970632

Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Polity Press.

Standing, G. (2016). The precariat: The new dangerous class (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Standing, G. (2021). The blue commons: The case for a new political economy beyond the crisis. Pelican Books.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Ticona, J., & Mateescu, A. (2022). Strategic ignorance: How platforms conceal labor exploitation through algorithmic opacity. MIT Press.

Weil, D. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726123

Woodcock, J. (2021). The algorithmic panopticon at Deliveroo: Measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 21(1), 67–95.

Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The gig economy: A critical introduction. Polity Press.

World Bank. (2023). Living wage estimates for developing economies: 2023 update. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/livelihoods

World Bank. (2022). Urban poverty and informality in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-3

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Dzreke, S., Dzreke, S. E., Dzreke, E., & Dzreke, F. M. (2025). Algorithmic exploitation in the gig economy: A living wage analysis of ride-hailing platforms in Lagos and Accra. Advanced Research Journal, 9(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.71350/3062192581

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)